Who benefits from the assertion that events are becoming uniform? The idea that the healing of a paralytic and the teaching on the mountain create a homogeneous reaction seems well-intentioned, but naive regarding crowd psychology.
A narrative like this ignores the deep motivations and often divergent interests of individuals, who filter information through their own agenda.
A healing is a punctual and spectacular act that evokes wonder or mistrust, whereas teaching requires intellectual engagement and persistence.
The incitement differs: for some, it is proof of power; for others, a threat to established authority — think of the Pharisees who perceive Jesus not as a savior but as an agitator.
The impact is never uniform, but always conditional on each person's personal interest.