The notion that an event 'standardizes' a teaching is an oversimplification; the reception of the teaching is often conditioned. It is more appropriate to see healing as a necessary condition that allows for better appropriation, but not a sufficient factor. Contextual factors remain predominant; a skeptical or hostile audience could interpret differently, or even reject, the demonstration of power. For example, a market would ignore positive economic data if consumer confidence is already eroded by external shocks. The discipline of analysis requires not to attribute a universal impact where behavioral variance is high.