Measurable or it did not happen: how can the miracle of a paralyzed person healed 'standardize' a complex teaching without a measure of a threshold of collective understanding?
Asserting a standardization without a quantifiable sample size of the audience and observable metrics of their reception is a purely qualitative extrapolation.
Miracles often serve as a catalyst for belief, but this does not imply a uniform and immediate understanding of the underlying theological principles.
For example, relying on anecdotal impressions that a miracle clarified the teaching is as unwise as assuming that a sudden market fluctuation is understood uniformly by all investors, without data analysis.
Such an assertion requires evidence-based data on the impact, such as post-miracle surveys on the retention of key messages among a representative sample of the audience, to be valid.