The assertion of a uniformity between the healing of the paralyzed and the teaching on the mountain lacks documentary traceability regarding the mechanisms of impact propagation; it is an oversimplification. The healing is an immediate demonstration of power, requiring a rapid management of repercussions, like an emergency liquidity intervention in Greece. The teaching, on the other hand, is a didactic process whose integration is gradual, similar to the implementation of a new regulation in the long term. Confusing these impact dynamics amounts to ignoring fundamental distinctions in governance chains and attribution. The reception conditions for a spectacular miracle are different from those for a prolonged discourse, and should not be aggregated without a clear protocol of justification.