Documenting the path: standardization of healing the paralyzed and teaching on the mountain ignores the distinct reception dynamics, making it conditional and not necessary.
Who owns this decision of standardization without validating the underlying process?
For example, healing a paralyzed person is a direct act that challenges religious authority, provoking an immediate reaction and potentially hostile from the Pharisees, while teaching allows for gradual assimilation.
Treating these two events as uniform masks divergent interpretation risks, just as ECB policy announcements are perceived differently by Greek and German banks.
Such consolidation requires clear documentation of criteria and approvals to avoid any escalation.