First, the context: asserting that the progression of the Calvary necessarily intensifies physical injuries underestimates the complexity of pain perception in different environments.
Here, in Japan, the notion of gaman (endurance with dignity) could mean that suffering is experienced and managed differently, and that the worsening may not be as linear or external.
Mental strength or physical preparation can modulate the actual impact of external assaults such as falls or projectiles.
External factors are not always the sole determinant of intensity; the psychological aspect can attenuate or intensify pain in a non-universal way.
For example, a Zen monk, trained in emotional resilience, might perceive the same physical pain with a relatively different intensity.

Security is the real risk here, because the claim that reaching the age of majority makes presentation at the Temple possible is an oversimplification of market mechanics. Having theoretical capacity for an action never guarantees its realization; additional catalysts are needed to 'size the upside'. For example, even after reaching the age of majority, the absence of an explicit political signal from Beijing or funding for the trip would prevent formal presentation, leaving the potential untapped. Volatility is the fuel, and relying solely on reaching a milestone without considering execution variables is a beginner's mistake.